CONFLICT MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES IN FARMER-HERDER CRISES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TRADITIONAL AND STATE-LED APPROACHES IN NASARAWA STATE, 2015-2023
Keywords:
Farmer–herder conflict, conflict management, traditional institutions, state-led approaches, conflict transformation theoryAbstract
This study examined conflict management strategies in farmer-herder crises through a comparative analysis of traditional and state-led approaches in Nasarawa State between 2015 and 2023. The study adopted a qualitative research design and relied on both primary and secondary sources of data. Primary data were obtained through twenty-four (24) Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) purposively conducted across nine Local Government Areas of Nasarawa State, namely Lafia, Doma, Keana, Keffi, Karu, Toto, Akwanga, Nasarawa Eggon, and Wamba. Respondents comprised traditional rulers, community leaders, farmer association leaders, pastoralist representatives, security personnel, local government officials, members of peace committees, and officials of relevant government ministries. Thematic saturation was reached after the twenty-first interview, while three additional interviews were conducted to validate emerging themes and ensure data reliability. Secondary data were sourced from textbooks, journal articles, government publications, policy documents, reports of international organisations, conference papers, and credible media sources. Data were analysed using thematic content analysis. The findings revealed that farmer-herder conflicts in Nasarawa State are primarily driven by competition over land and water resources, population growth, climate change, destruction of farmlands by cattle, cattle rustling, weak enforcement of grazing regulations, and the proliferation of small arms. The study further found that traditional approaches such as mediation by traditional rulers, community dialogue, customary arbitration, and reconciliation mechanisms enjoy greater local legitimacy and acceptance among disputing parties. The study concluded that neither traditional nor state-led approaches alone can effectively address farmer-herder conflicts. Rather, a complementary and integrated framework that combines the legitimacy of traditional institutions with the enforcement capacity of the state offers the most sustainable pathway for conflict management and rural peacebuilding in Nasarawa State.References
Abbass, I. M. (2012). No retreat no surrender: Conflict for survival between Fulani pastoralists and farmers in northern Nigeria. European Scientific Journal, 8(1), 331–346.
Abdullahi, A. A. (2023). Assessment of traditional conflict resolution mechanisms in farmer-pastoralist conflicts in North-Central Nigeria (Doctoral thesis). Federal University of Technology Minna, Niger State, Nigeria.
Adebayo, A. G. (2020). Conflict management in Africa: The role of traditional institutions. African Conflict and Peacebuilding Review, 10(2), 45–62.
Adisa, R. S. (2012). Land use conflict between farmers and herdsmen: Implications for agricultural and rural development in Nigeria. Rural Development Journal, 6(1), 35–42.
Aondohemba, T. I., Ugbede, M. A., & Shawa, J. A. (2025). Traditional institutions and state responses in farmer-herder conflict management in Katsina-Ala Local Government Area of Benue State, Nigeria. African Journal of Conflict Resolution, 25(1), 44–67.
Benjaminsen, T. A., & Ba, B. (2019). Why do pastoralists in the Sahel become violent? Farmer–herder conflicts as insurgency. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 57(1), 1–24.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Innovations for Poverty Action (IPA). (2025). Dialogue-based interventions and social cohesion among farmer-herder communities in Nigeria. IPA Research Report.
International Crisis Group. (2018). Stopping Nigeria’s spiralling farmer-herder violence. Crisis Group Africa Report No. 262.
Jeong, H. W. (2008). Understanding conflict and conflict analysis. Sage Publications.
Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. United States Institute of Peace Press.
Miall, H. (2004). Conflict transformation: A multi-dimensional task. Bergh of Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management.
Miyetti Allah Cattle Breeders Association of Nigeria. (2025). Position paper on nomadic education and peaceful coexistence in pastoral communities. Abuja: MACBAN Publications.
Nwankwo, C. U. (2024). Territorial partitioning, indigeneity and farmer-herder conflicts in the Benue-Nasarawa region of Nigeria. Heliyon, 10(4), e24567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24567
Ojo, A. T., Ibrahim, M. A., & Salihu, Y. K. (2025). Third-party intervention and the management of farmer-herder conflicts in Kwara State, Nigeria. African Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies, 12(2), 88–107
Okoli, A. C., & Atelhe, G. A. (2014). Nomads against natives: A political ecology of herder/farmer conflicts in Nasarawa State, Nigeria. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 4(2), 76–88.
Punch Newspapers. (2025, February 12). FUDECO advocates revival of nomadic education to address pastoral conflict in Nigeria. Punch News. https://punchng.com
Ripples Nigeria. (2025, March 3). Stakeholders push for nomadic education reform to reduce farmer-herder clashes. Ripples Nigeria. https://www.ripplesnigeria.com
Vanguard Newspaper. (2024, December 18). ACReSAL project brings peace to Nasarawa communities as water interventions reduce farmer-herder conflicts. Vanguard Newspapers. https://www.vanguardngr.com
World Bank. (2023). Agro-Climatic Resilience in Semi-Arid Landscapes (ACReSAL) project implementation report. World Bank Publications.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, adaptation, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors are permitted to post their work online in institutional/disciplinary repositories or on their own websites. Pre-print versions posted online should include a citation and link to the final published version in Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication as soon as the issue is available; post-print versions (including the final publisher's PDF) should include a citation and link to the journal's website.