DIFFERENTIAL PREDICTION OF ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT BY COGNITIVE STRATEGIES AND ACHIEVEMENT GOALS AMONG UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS IN BENUE STATE, NIGERIA

Authors

  • Idoko Sunday Inyila, PhD Department of Educational Foundations, Reverend Father Moses Orshio Adasu University, Makurdi, Benue state Author
  • Idah Moses Ode Department of sociology, Federal University of Lafia, Lafia Nasarawa State Author

Keywords:

Cognitive strategies, Achievement goals, Academic achievement, Motivation, Undergraduate students and Benue state

Abstract

This study investigated the differential prediction of academic achievement by cognitive strategies and achievement goals among undergraduate students in Benue State, Nigeria. Three hypotheses were tested and correlational survey research design was employed. The population of the study comprises of 8448 (300 level) undergraduate students in Benue. The sample size of the study is 365. Multi-stage sampling technique was used and 310 students responded and returned their questionnaires. Cognitive strategies questionnaire (CSQ), Achievement goals questionnaire-Revised (AGQ-R) and students’ cumulative grade point average (CGPA) were used as instruments for data collection. The instruments were validated through face validity. For the reliability, Achievement Goals Questionnaire-Revised: mastery approach goals .775, mastery avoidance goals .909, performance approach goals .846 and performance avoidance goals .837.  Cognitive Strategies: rehearsal strategies .800, elaboration strategies .837, organization strategies .825 and critical thinking strategies .839. Data were analyzed with multiple regression and independent sample t- test statistics. The findings of the study revealed that: there is significant differential prediction of academic achievement by cognitive strategies and achievement goals. Beta weights (β) for cognitive strategies is .925 and -.002 for achievement goals with cognitive strategies as a higher predictor. There is no significant difference in achievement goals (t=.105, p = 0.916) and cognitive strategies (t =.453, p = 0.651) of Arts and Science students. There is no significant gender difference in achievement goals (t = .898, p = 0.370) and cognitive strategies (t = .735, p = 0.463) of students. It was concluded that Cognitive strategies predict academic achievement of students better than achievement goals. It was recommended that students should be sensitized to utilize cognitive strategies to improve their academic achievement. Teachers should adopt cognitive oriented teaching strategies to improve academic achievement of students. Domains of cognitive strategies should be introduced in teachers’ training curriculum.

References

Alami M. (2019). Causes of poor academic achievement among Omani students. International Journal of social science Research. ISSN 2327-5510, Vol.4 No 1

Biyikli C. & Dogan N. (2020). The effect of learning strategies used for rehearsal on academic success of students at Ankara Tevfik Fikret primary school. Journal of Education and science, Vol. 40,No 181, 311-327.

Elliot A.J, McGregor H.A & Gable .S (2019). Achievement, Goal, study strategies and Exam performance: A meditational Analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology .American psychological Association. Vol.91 No3 549 -563

Elliot, A.J. & Murayama, K. (2020). On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 613-628.

Kaptun C.S, Mailu S.N & Koech P.K (2018). Relationship between learning strategies and students performance in physics in public secondary schools in Nakuru East sub-county Kenya. European journal of social science studies, Vol. 3, Issue 3 P 237-238 Doi 10.5281/zenodo 1477488

Likko G.L (2021) Relationships between achievement goals, metacognitive awareness and academic success among students of colleges of education in North-Western Nigeria. PhD. Dissertation, Ahmadu Bello University Zaria

Marcellus L. (2024). Are we missing anything? Pursuing Research on Attrition, CJNR 2014, Vol. 36 N0 3, 82-98.

Matseke P.M (2020). The influence of learning strategies, learners’ self-efficacy and academic achievement of township primary school learners. Master Degree Dissertation, University of South Africa.

McGill. R, Currier S, Duncan C & Douglas P. (2018). Improving the evidence base in support of sharing learning materials. American Journal of Educational Psychology Vol.3, N0 6, pp 89-95

Nabizadeh S., Hajian S, Shekhan Z. and Rafiei F. (2019). Prediction of academic achievement based on learning strategies and outcome expectations among medical students. BMC Medical Education Volume 19, Article number 99.

Olatunji S.O, Omoregie D.O, Aghimien A.E & Olusola E.O (2022). Factor affecting achievement of undergraduate students in construction disciplines. Journal of Education and practice. Vol.7, N0 13,www iiste.org

Ruffing S. Wach F.S, Spinath F.M, Brunken R. and Karbach J. (2021). Learning strategies and general cognitive ability as predictors of gender-specific academic achievement. Frontiers in psychology doi: 103389/fpsyg2015.01238..

Taylor R.T. (2022). Review of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ) using reliability generalization techniques to assess scale reliability. PhD. Dessertation, Auburn University, Alabama

Downloads

Published

2026-06-29

How to Cite

DIFFERENTIAL PREDICTION OF ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT BY COGNITIVE STRATEGIES AND ACHIEVEMENT GOALS AMONG UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS IN BENUE STATE, NIGERIA. (2026). Impact International Journals and Publications, 2(issue 2), 1665-1676. https://impactinternationaljournals.com/publications/index.php/ojs/article/view/545

Similar Articles

1-10 of 351

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.