PREDICTING STUDENTS' ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK

Authors

  • Otse Moses Okpekwu Federal College of Agriculture, Ibadan Author
  • Rapheal Umoru Sunday PhD2 Wesley University Ondo Author
  • Peter Anyanwu C. PhD Wesley University Ondo Author

Keywords:

students’ performance, e-learning;, artificial neural network, optimization algorithms, firefly algorithm

Abstract

University electronic learning (e-learning) has witnessed phenomenal growth, especially in 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This type of education is significant because it ensures that all students receive the required learning. The statistical evaluations are limited in providing good predictions of the university’s e-learning quality. That is forcing many universities to go to online and blended learning environments. This paper presents an approach of statistical analysis to identify the most common factors that affect the students’ performance and then use artificial neural networks (ANNs) to predict students’ performance within the blended learning environment of Saudi Electronic University (SEU). Accordingly, this study generated a dataset from SEU’s Blackboard learning management system. The proposed model’s performance was evaluated through different statistical tests, such as error functions, statistical hypothesis tests, and ANOVA tests. The student’s performance can be tested using a set of factors: the studying (face-to-face or virtual), percentage of attending live lectures, midterm exam scores, and percentage of solved assessments. The results showed that the four factors are responsible for academic performance. After that, we proposed a new ANN model to predict the students’ performance depending on the four factors. Firefly Algorithm (FFA) was used for training the ANNs.

References

Al-araibi, A. A. M., Mahrin, M. N. R. B., & Yusoff, R. C. M. (2019). Technological aspect factors of e-learning readiness in higher education institutions: Delphi technique. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 567–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9780-9

Almaiah, M. A., Al-Khasawneh, A., & Althunibat, A. (2020). Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the e-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 5261–5280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10219-y

Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., Malkawi, B., Glowatz, M., Burton, R., Magni, P., & Lam, S. (2020). COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 3(1), 1–20.*

Gabai, S., & Ornager, S. (2012, June 14). Smart e-learning through media and information literacy. In Proceedings of the Fourth TCU International e-Learning Conference: Smart Innovations in Education & Lifelong Learning (Bangkok, Thailand).

Hu, P. J.-H., & Hui, W. (2012). Examining the role of learning engagement in technology-mediated learning and its effects on learning effectiveness and satisfaction. Decision Support Systems, 53(4), 782–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.05.014

Kaup, S., Jain, R., Shivalli, S., Pandey, S., & Kaup, S. (2020). Sustaining academics during COVID-19 pandemic: The role of online teaching-learning. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 68(7), 1220–1221. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1241_20

Masie, E. (2008). What is the meaning of the E in e-learning? In E. Biech (Ed.), ASTD handbook for workplace learning professionals (p. 227). Association for Talent Development.

Olafsen, R. N., & Cetindamar, D. (2005). E-learning in a competitive firm setting. In Innovations in Education and Teaching International (Vol. 42, pp. 325–335). Taylor & Francis.

Shailaja, J., & Sridaran, R. (2014, March 6–7). Taxonomy of e-learning challenges and an insight to blended learning. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Intelligent Computing Applications (pp. 310–314). Coimbatore, India.

Sun, P.-C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y.-Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007

Wolbrink, T. A., & Burns, J. P. (2012). Internet-based learning and applications for critical care medicine. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, 27(5), 322–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066611406857

Downloads

Published

2025-10-10

How to Cite

PREDICTING STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK. (2025). Impact International Journals and Publications, 1(issue 4), 45-52. https://impactinternationaljournals.com/publications/index.php/ojs/article/view/109

Similar Articles

61-70 of 150

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.