EDUCATIONAL UTILISATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TOOLS FOR LEARNING: PATTERNS, ETHICS, AND CHALLENGES AMONG UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN KWARA STATE, NIGERIA

Authors

  • Okikiola Jamiu Muhammed Department of Educational Technology, Faculty of Education, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria Author
  • Alimi Adebayo Emmanuel (Ph.D.) Department of Educational Technology, Faculty of Education, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria Author
  • Oyinloye Oyeyemi Jethro Department of Educational Technology, Faculty of Education, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria Author
  • Michael Bulus Steven https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2910-8498 Author
  • Raji, Farouk Abiodun Department of Educational Technology, Faculty of Education, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria Author

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence Tools, Ethical Compliance, Utilisation Patterns, Challenges of AI, University Students

Abstract

This study investigated the educational utilisation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools for learning among university students in Kwara State, Nigeria, focusing on utilisation patterns, perceived ethical compliance, and associated challenges. The study was motivated by limited institutional guidance on responsible AI use in higher education. A descriptive survey research design was adopted, and 398 undergraduate students were selected through multistage sampling techniques. Data were collected using a validated questionnaire and analysed using mean, standard deviation, and independent-samples t-test at the 0.05 level of significance. Findings revealed high utilisation of AI tools for academic activities such as idea generation, content clarification, research support, and self-assessment. Students indicated relatively high levels of ethical compliance in their use of AI tools; however, lower ratings were observed for adherence to institutional policies and avoidance of overdependence. The findings reflect students’ self-reported perceptions of AI use rather than directly observed behaviour. In addition, institutional and infrastructural constraints were identified as major challenges to responsible AI utilisation. Gender analysis showed no significant differences in utilisation patterns or challenges, but a significant difference was found in awareness of institutional guidelines in favour of male students. The study concludes that while AI tools are widely utilised for learning, strengthened institutional guidelines and targeted AI literacy initiatives are required to promote responsible and effective use of AI tools in higher education. It is recommended that universities redesign assessments to emphasizes higher-order thinking to reduce uncritical AI reliance.

References

Alimi, A. E., Buraimoh, O. F., Aladesusi, G. A. & Babalola, E. O. (2021). University Students’ Awareness of, Access to, and use of Artificial Intelligence for Learning in Kwara State. Indonesian Journal of Teaching in Science (IJOTIS), 1(1), 91-104. Published by the Uniersitas Pendidikan, Indonesia. Available online at https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/IJoTis

Alimi, A. E., Damilola, J. S., Ibironke, E. S., Abdulrahman, M. R., Falade, A. A., Nuhu, K. M., & Asiyanbola, C. (2024). Secondary School Teachers’ Awareness of, Access to and Adoption of Artificial Intelligence for Teaching in Ilorin-west, Nigeria. International College, KRIRK University. ASEAN Journal of Research, 2(2), 66-78. Published by the Kirk University, Thailand. Available Online at: https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/KMR/issue/view/17722/5138

Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2023). Mapping Research in Student Engagement and Educational Technology in Higher Education: A Systematic Evidence Map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00394-9

Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence and its Implications for Academic Integrity. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100128

Holmes, W., & Tuomi, I. (2022). State of the art and practice in AI in education. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 542–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12533

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Krusche, S., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Lund, A., & Wang, F. (2023). Educational technologies, equity, and inclusion in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(5), 1841–1856. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13321

Perkins, M., Roe, J., & McKay, T. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Assessment Integrity in Higher Education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(7), 1051–1065. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2172037

Raosoft Inc. (2004). Raosoft sample size calculator. Raosoft Incorporated.

Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). Responsible use of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Ethical and Pedagogical Perspectives. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(6), 2251–2270. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13367

UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative artificial intelligence in education and research. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org

Downloads

Published

2026-01-31

How to Cite

EDUCATIONAL UTILISATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TOOLS FOR LEARNING: PATTERNS, ETHICS, AND CHALLENGES AMONG UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN KWARA STATE, NIGERIA. (2026). Impact International Journals and Publications, 2(issue 1), 175-184. https://impactinternationaljournals.com/publications/index.php/ojs/article/view/206