REGULATORY AND ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN NIGERIAN LEGAL PRACTICE

Authors

  • Paul, Isaac Akpomoshi, PhD Faculty of Law Nasarawa State University Keffi (NSUK), Nasarawa State, Nigeria Author
  • Yakubu, Philip Agbu, LL.M Faculty of Law Nasarawa State University Keffi (NSUK), Nasarawa State, Nigeria Author

Keywords:

Regulatory, Ethical Implication, Artificial Intelligence, Legal Practice

Abstract

This study examined the intersection of artificial intelligence and legal practice in Nigeria, assessing both the opportunities and challenges presented by AI integration within a framework traditionally reliant on conventional legal tools and governed by existing statutes and rules of court. Adopting a doctrinal methodology, the research revealed that while artificial intelligence offered substantial benefits to Nigerian legal practice including enhanced efficiency in legal research, improved accuracy in document review, and reduced costs, the absence of a comprehensive legal framework specifically regulating AI constituted a critical impediment to its optimal and responsible utilisation. The study contributed to legal scholarship by evaluating the adequacy of existing Nigerian legal instruments, including the Evidence Act, the Nigeria Data Protection Act, and the Rules of Professional Conduct, in addressing AI-specific challenges and identifying gaps requiring legislative attention. Based on these findings, the research recommended that the National Assembly enact specific legislation regulating AI in Nigeria, establishing standards for algorithmic transparency, liability frameworks for AI-generated harm, and oversight mechanisms, with particular provisions addressing AI use in legal practice including standards for AI-generated evidence and requirements for algorithmic accountability in legal decision-making.

References

1. Adebayo K., The Digital Divide in Nigeria’s Legal Sector: Can AI Bridge the Gap? (Journal of Law and Technology, 8(2) 2022) 112-130.

2. Adejumo v. Governor of Lagos State (1972) 3 SC 45.

3. Adewoye O, The Legal Profession in Nigeria: A Historical Perspective (Discusses the evolution of Nigerian legal practice 1998).

4. Aletras N. and Others (2016). Predicting Judicial Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights. (PeerJ Computer Science 2016) accessed on 10 July, 2025.

5. Aletras N. and Others (2016). Predicting Judicial Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights. (PeerJ Computer Science 2016) accessed on 10 July, 2025.

6. American Bar Association (ABA) Report on the Future of Legal Services in the United States (2019).

7. Babalola A, Contemporary Issues in Nigerian Legal Practice Covers ethics, technology, and reforms (2020)

8. Casey A.J. and A. Niblett, A. (2019). Self-Driving Laws. (University of Toronto Law Journal. SSRN 2019).

9. Chief Gani Fawehinmi v. Nigerian Bar Association (No. 2) (1989) 2 NWLR (Pt. 105) 558.

10. Eze P., Regulating AI in Nigeria: The Need for a Legal Framework. Nigerian (Journal of Technology Law & Policy, 7(1), 2022) 33-50.

11. Grossman M.R, and G.V. Cormack, G. V. (2016). Technology-Assisted Review in E-Discovery Can Be More Effective and Efficient Than Exhaustive Manual Review. Richmond Journal of Law & Technology ( PDF 2016).

12. International Bar Association (IBA). Artificial Intelligence and Robotics in Legal Services (Addresses global ethical concerns, including liability for AI errors in legal practice 2021).

13. Katz D.M. and M.J. Bommarito and J. Blackman, A general approach for predicting the behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States. (PLOS ONE. 2017) < DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174698> accessed on 10 July, 2025.

14. Kira Systems. Machine Learning for Contract Review (2023) <https://kirasystems.com> accessed 6 August 2020.

15. LawGeex, AI vs. Lawyers: Comparing Accuracy & Speed in Contract Review.( Report 2018)

16. Legal Defence and Assistance Project (LEDAP). (2022). Digitization of Nigerian Case Laws: Challenges and Opportunities.

17. Legal Practitioners Act (LPA) – Cap. L11, LFN 2004.

18. McCarthy J., What is artificial intelligence? Stanford University. 2007 < http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/whatisai/> accessed 3rd August 2025.

19. McGinnis J.O and R.G. Pearce, The Great Disruption: How Machine Intelligence Will Transform the Role of Lawyers in the Delivery of Legal Services (82 Fordham Law Review 2014)

20. Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Cybersecurity and Data Protection Guidelines for Lawyers (Highlights risks associated with AI-driven legal tech and client confidentiality 2020).

21. Okafor v. NBA (2020) LPELR-50246(CA).

22. Okafor v. Nweke (2007) 10 NWLR (Pt. 1043) 521.

23. Oke E.O., Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Legal Practice in Nigeria: Challenges and Prospects (NIALS Journal of Law and Public Policy, 5(1), 45-62 2021).

24. Okike v. LPDC (2005) 15 NWLR (Pt. 949) 471.

25. Olowu D., AI and the Nigerian Lawyer: Attitudes Towards Legal Tech Adoption. (African Journal of Comparative Law, 12(3), 2023) 78-95.

26. Remus D, and F. Levy, Can Robots Be Lawyers? Computers, Lawyers, and the Practice of Law. (Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 2017)

27. Rich E., and K. Knight, Artificial intelligence (2nd ed. McGraw-Hill.1991)

28. Rules of Professional Conduct

29. Russell S., and p. Norvig, Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed. Pearson 2021)

30. Savelka J. and K.D. Ashley, AI in Legal Document Review: An Empirical Study. Artificial Intelligence and Law.( Springer 2021)

31. Surden H., Machine Learning and Law (89 Washington Law Review 2014)

Downloads

Published

2026-02-27

How to Cite

REGULATORY AND ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN NIGERIAN LEGAL PRACTICE . (2026). Impact International Journals and Publications, 2(issue 1), 811-825. https://impactinternationaljournals.com/publications/index.php/ojs/article/view/260

Most read articles by the same author(s)