A REVIEW OF MONTE CARLO SIMULATION OF ORGANS AT RISK IN PROSTATE CANCER TREATMENT USING SPACER GEL IN NIGERIA

Authors

  • Ajani Adegbenro Sunday Department of Physics and Material Science, P. M. B. 1530 Kwara State University, Malete, Ilorin, Nigeria. Author
  • Oladipo Adeshina Eniola Physics Programme, Bowen University, Iwo, Osun State, Nigeria. Author
  • Odeyami Charity Segun Department of Physics and Material Science, P. M. B. 1530 Kwara State University, Malete, Ilorin, Nigeria. Author
  • Egbeyale Godwin Babatude Department of Physics and Material Science, P. M. B. 1530 Kwara State University, Malete, Ilorin, Nigeria. Author
  • Ajani Oluwatayo Sandra Adeleke University, Ede, Osun State, Nigeria. Author
  • Oladipo Dorcas Moyirade Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology Ogbomoso, Oyo State, Nigeria. Author
  • Oyero Olaoluwa Peter Ladoke Akintola University of Technology Teaching Hospital, Ogbomoso, Oyo State, Nigeria. Author
  • Amoo Olufumilayo Kunbi Directorate of Educational Services, Bowen University Iwo, Osun State. Author

Keywords:

Prostate cancer, radiotherapy, hydrogel spacer, Monte Carlo simulation, organs at risk,, Nigeria, low-resource settings

Abstract

In Nigeria, prostate cancer is a major burden in oncology due to its increasing incidence and mortality rates. The main curative treatment for localized disease is radiotherapy, but dose escalation required to achieve optimal tumour control is limited by the proximity of organs at risk (OARs) such as the rectum and bladder. The review examines the potential application of hydrogel spacers in prostate radiotherapy, the role that Monte Carlo (MC) simulation plays in accurate OARs dosimetry, the international evidence for the effectiveness of spacers, and the analysis of implementing feasibility within the Nigerian healthcare context. A narrative synthesis of peer-reviewed literature was conducted, focusing on hydrogel spacer applications, the MC dosimetry methodologies, the clinical outcomes from several trials executed in the settings of low- and middle-income countries, and infrastructure assessments of radiotherapy, in which specific emphasis was on Nigeria.  Hydrogel spacers in international randomized controlled trials have shown to achieve a separation of 10-15 mm between the prostate and rectum, reducing rectal V70 Gy by 60-80% and decreasing late grade ≥2 rectal toxicity from 5-15% to 1-5%. The accuracy of MC simulation provides superior accuracy in modeling dose perturbations at the tissue-spacer interface to a greater extent, with errors reduced from >10% to <2%. However, there are significant barriers to its implementation in Nigeria, which include the 10-15 functional linear accelerators available for the over 220 million population, which is <0.05 per million versus the recommended >4 million, prohibitive spacer costs >$5,000 per procedure, scarcity of treatment planning systems that are MC-capable, and drastic shortages of qualified medical physics personnel. While hydrogel spacers combined with MC-based planning offer proven improvements in the therapeutic ratio of prostate radiotherapy, a variety of significant infrastructure, financing, and human resource challenges restrict the immediate implementation of these in Nigerian healthcare. Strategic investments in radiotherapy infrastructure, training of professionals, and conducting context-specific research are essential for everyone to access these advancements.

References

1. Adeloye D, David RA, and Aderemi AV. An estimate of the incidence of prostate cancer in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2016;11(4): e0153496.

2. Odedina FT, Akinremi TO, and Chinegwundoh F. Prostate cancer disparities in Black men of African descent: a comparative literature review. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(10): e430-e438.

3. Hamstra DA, Mariados N, and Sylvester J. Continued benefit to rectal separation for prostate radiation therapy: final results of a phase III trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;97(5):976-985.

4. Pinkawa M. Spacer application for prostate cancer radiation therapy. Future Oncol. 2014;10(5):775-786.

5. Mariados N, Sylvester J, Shah D, et al. Hydrogel spacer prospective multicenter randomized controlled pivotal trial: 12-month follow-up. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;93(3): S1-S2.

6. Hamstra DA, Mariados N, Sylvester J, et al. Continued benefit to rectal separation for prostate radiation therapy: final results of a phase III trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;97(5):976-985.

7. Chetty IJ, Curran B, Cygler JE, et al. Report of the AAPM Task Group 105: issues associated with clinical implementation of Monte Carlo-based photon and electron external beam treatment planning. Med Phys. 2007;34(12):4818-4853.

8. Miller LE, Efstathiou JA, Bhattacharyya SK, et al. Association of the placement of a perirectal hydrogel spacer with the clinical outcomes of men receiving radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(6):e208221.

9. Tehrani FJ, Krempien R, Krempien M, et al. Comprehensive review of hydrogel spacers prior to radiation therapy for prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2023;131(1):13-21.

10. Hedrick SG, Fagundes M, Robison B, et al. Hydrogel rectum-prostate spacers mitigate the uncertainties in proton therapy of the prostate with full bladder. Acta Oncol. 2017;56(5):663-669.

11. Chao M, Ho H, Chan Y, et al. Application of a radiopaque viscous hydrogel spacer for prostate cancer radiation therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024;14(1):45-52.

12. Andreo P. Monte Carlo techniques in medical radiation physics. Phys Med Biol. 1991;36(7):861-920.

13. Ma CM, Li J. Dose calculation and verification for photon beam radiotherapy with Monte Carlo methods. Med Phys. 2011;38(Suppl 1):S164.

14. Wilcox EE, Daskalov GM, Pavlović R, et al. Accuracy of dose calculations in prostate radiotherapy using Monte Carlo. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2010;11(3):200-210.

15. Fragoso M, Pillai S, Solberg TD, et al. Experimental verification of a commercial Monte Carlo-based dose calculation algorithm for prostate cancer treatment planning. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55(24):7361-7374.

16. Schneider U, Hälg RA, Besserer J. Monte Carlo simulation of a prostate gold seed marker with a spacer. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022;23(5):e13578.

17. Wolf J, Schneider U, Hälg RA. Hydrogel rectum-prostate spacers mitigate the uncertainties in proton therapy of the prostate with full bladder. Acta Oncol. 2017;56(5):663-669.

18. Hissoiny S, Ozell B, Després P. Fast Monte Carlo dose calculation using GPU technology for radiotherapy. Med Phys. 2011;38(12):6549-6557.

19. Götstedt J, Karlsson H, Kero T, et al. Monte Carlo simulations for dosimetry in prostate radiotherapy with different intravesical volumes. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0159497.

20. Schneider U, Vees H, Besserer J, et al. Preclinical investigations towards the first spacer gel application in prostate cancer treatment. Phys Med. 2013;29(3):258-262.

21. Fischer-Valuck BW, Chundury A, Gay H, et al. Hydrogel spacer distribution and dosimetric impact on rectal sparing in prostate SBRT. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024;25(1):e14294.

22. Eckerman KF, et al. Systematic study of the iodinated rectal hydrogel spacer material effect on the proton dose. Med Phys. 2022;49(10):6525-6535.

23. Hedrick SG, Fagundes M, Robison B, et al. Hydrogel rectum-prostate spacers mitigate the uncertainties in proton therapy. Acta Oncol. 2017;56(5):663-669.

24. Wolf J, et al. Hydrogel rectum-prostate spacers in proton therapy. Acta Oncol. 2017.

25. Eckerman KF, et al. Systematic study of the iodinated rectal hydrogel spacer. Med Phys. 2022.

26. Alongi F, et al. Hydrogel spacers in prostate radiotherapy: a promising approach to decrease rectal toxicity. Future Oncol. 2021;17(24):3237-3246.

27. Alongi F, et al. Rationale for utilization of hydrogel rectal spacers in dose escalated SBRT for prostate cancer. Front Oncol. 2022;12:860848.

28. Duncan OC, Irabor OC, et al. Infrastructural challenges lead to delay of curative radiotherapy in sub-Saharan Africa: the case of Nigeria. JCO Glob Oncol. 2020;6:271-276.

29. BusinessDay. Nigeria needs 120 cancer treatment machines but has only 15 - report. 2025. Available from: https://businessday.ng/health/article/nigeria-needs-120-cancer-treatment-machines-but-has-only-15-report

30. Oboh AE, et al. Radiotherapy waiting time in Northern Nigeria. Afr J Med Med Sci. 2020.

31. Irabor OC, et al. Radiotherapy in Nigeria: a silent emergency in cancer care. Lancet Oncol. 2023.

32. Vanderpuye V, et al. Expanding radiotherapy access in Sub-Saharan Africa. Lancet Oncol. 2023.

33. Abdel-Wahab M, et al. Global radiotherapy challenge: the gap between need and access. Lancet Oncol. 2023.

34. News Agency of Nigeria. FG activates 8 oncology clinics, unveils new cancer plans. 2026. Available from: https://nannews.ng/2026/02/04/fg-activates-8-oncology-clinics-unveils-new-cancer-plans

35. Zubizarreta E, et al. Need for radiotherapy in Africa. Lancet Oncol. 2023.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-06

How to Cite

A REVIEW OF MONTE CARLO SIMULATION OF ORGANS AT RISK IN PROSTATE CANCER TREATMENT USING SPACER GEL IN NIGERIA. (2026). Impact International Journals and Publications, 2(issue 1), 1008-1017. https://impactinternationaljournals.com/publications/index.php/ojs/article/view/279