A HERMENEUTIC ANALYSIS OF PERSONAL RECOGNITION IN BUBER AND KANT

Authors

  • Adedayo Jenfa C.M. Department of Philosophy, University of Lagos, Nigeria Author

Keywords:

Personal Recognition, Buberian Philosophy, Kantian Ethics, Thou Relationship, Dialogue, Human dignity, Categorical Imperative

Abstract

Personal recognition is central to human self-understanding, ethical conduct, and social cohesion. This paper examines recognition through the philosophical perspectives of Martin Buber and Immanuel Kant, arguing that an integrative approach captures both its relational and ethical dimensions. Using a hermeneutical methodology, the study analyses Buber’s I-Thou framework, which emphasises dialogue, mutual presence, and treating others as subjects rather than objects. Kant’s Categorical Imperative, by contrast, establishes recognition as a moral duty grounded in universal principles, respect for autonomy, and the intrinsic dignity of all persons. By comparing these perspectives, the paper shows that relational engagement alone risks subjectivity, while moral obligation alone may lack practical relational grounding. Integrating Buberian and Kantian insights provides a dual framework where recognition is both ethically mandated and relationally enacted. The study further demonstrates the practical relevance of this model in conflict resolution, showing how recognising the rights, autonomy, and dignity of all parties can mitigate disputes, foster cooperation, and strengthen social cohesion. Ultimately, the paper contributes to debates in moral philosophy, social theory, and conflict studies by presenting recognition as a comprehensive moral and relational practice, bridging individual experience and universal ethical obligation.

References

Amstutz, L. S., & Mullet, J. (2005). The little book of restorative discipline for schools: Teaching responsibility, creating caring climates. Good Books.

Buber, M. (1923). I and Thou. Charles Scribner’s Sons.

Darby, J. (2001). The effects of violence on peace processes. United States Institute of Peace Press.

Fraser, N. (1997). Justice interruptus: Critical reflections on the “postsocialist” condition. Routledge.

Gadamer, H.-G. (1977). Philosophical hermeneutics (D. E. Linge, Trans.). University of California Press.

Hegel, G. W. F. (1807). Phenomenology of spirit. Oxford University Press.

Honneth, A. (1996). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Polity Press.

Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I. (1795). Perpetual peace: A philosophical sketch. Hackett Publishing Company.

Robinson, P. (2018). The law of armed conflict: International humanitarian law in war. Cambridge University Press.

Taylor, C. (1992). Multiculturalism and the politics of recognition. Princeton University Press.

The Good Friday Agreement (Belfast Agreement). (1998). United Kingdom & Ireland.

Tutu, D. M. (1999). No future without forgiveness. Doubleday.

Zehr, H. (2002). The little book of restorative justice. Good Books.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-09

How to Cite

A HERMENEUTIC ANALYSIS OF PERSONAL RECOGNITION IN BUBER AND KANT. (2026). Impact International Journals and Publications, 2(issue 2), 100-111. https://impactinternationaljournals.com/publications/index.php/ojs/article/view/363

Similar Articles

41-50 of 137

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.